First of all, the reviews that I received were harsh to say the least. They did not give constructive criticism, most of them were cruel and insensitive comments regarding the supposed malfunctioning of the site. The worst thing is, it seems like most of them were run at a time when I was either working on the site, or the kayak API was down. Overall I was extremely hurt by the reviews.
One comment I will quote on was "it looks like it didn't have a lot of time put into it." I have worked extremely hard on this site putting in at least ten hours a week working on it since the beginning of the semester, somtimes more. I feel like I have made significant progress since Iteration One and am proud of my acomplishments. This is the very fist time that I have ever created a mashup, or a php file and I personally feel that it was a valiant attempt for a first-timer. To receive comments such as, "They are basically telling you that their site sucks and to go elsewhere. It just looks horrible all together, I wouldnt have spent more than two seconds here if I didnt have to, it was a complete waste of time." is extremely hurtful.
Professor Gibson's intentions were honorable with administration of this extra credit assignment. I was hoping to have suggestions that I could somehow use to enhance the site. However, these comments did not accomplish my expectations.